Women in investment banking on Wall Street getting a raw deal

Women in investment banking on Wall Street
What is it about Wall Street that turns well-educated men into a$$holes?

It’s no secret that the world of high finance is one of the most offensive working environments for women. As for women on Wall Street, well, some say you have to be almost masochistic to choose a career where sexual harassment comes with the territory.

What is it about this career path that brings out the worst in men, especially towards their female colleagues? Drawing parallels between chasing big bucks and hunting game, experts believe that the high stakes on Wall Street turn men into evolutionary throwbacks.

In both cases, fuelled by rising testosterone levels, they are intoxicated by the thrill of the chase. Money has a way of appealing to our base nature, and in this case, the bigger the bucks, the better the game and the more beastly the hunter.

It’s a territorial thing, it’s a chauvinistic thing. And it’s way out of line. Whether riding the rush in the trading ring or hiding the beast in a pin-stripe suit at a hedge fund, the rules are the same – women have no place in this all-male domain, or so the guys seem to believe.

To a large extent, the ‘hunters of Wall Street’ have succeeded in using their locker room culture to safeguard what they perceive as ‘their territory’. When not making money, they are debasing and humiliating their female colleagues. Constantly.

Often, the abuse starts at the interview stage, where women applicants are asked whether they are married, whether they have plans to marry and, if so, to promise never to have children.

Oftentimes, male bosses question a female subordinate’s ‘commitment to the job’, which is code for marriage and babies.

Maureen Sherry, a former managing director at Bear Stearns, offers a shocking account of sexual discrimination against women and sexual abuse in the corridors of high finance, in her novel Opening Belle. “A trading floor has everything to keep the adrenal glands pumping cortisol,” Sherry writes. “Breaking news, tragedy, money, racism, sexism, and a little less overt sex play than in the past. The blow-up dolls that floated around in the early ’90s have been deflated, and deliveries of erotic chocolates have ceased.” The bullies are now letting it all hang out.

Not infrequently, male colleagues refer to hiring women as an exercise in ‘beautifying’ the office, or, as John LeFevre mentions in his book Straight To Hell: True Tales of Deviance, Debauchery, And Billion-Dollar Deals, women are treated like ‘tethered goats’. He’s referring to the practice of taking along attractive women subordinates or colleagues to business meetings as ‘eye candy’. Sometimes, clients even request that a specific female colleague be ‘brought along’ to meetings or drinks, he reveals.

A former investment banker, LeFevre points out that the work environment in finance is overtly exclusionary. Male colleagues bond with each other, their superiors and with clients over drinks or during social activities that are not conducive to women.

This kind of bonding often results in some great opportunities, plum deals, lucrative accounts and promotions, leaving their female counterparts at a huge disadvantage. Obviously, this has nothing to do with merit or talent and everything to do with being part of the boys’ club.

What is even more outrageous is that the women who still want to make it on Wall Street, despite the overwhelmingly hostile environment, are forced to sign the U4, an arbitration agreement that binds an employee to settle any job dispute with her employer in-house.

This is almost a no-win for a woman at the receiving end of sexual harassment or gender discrimination because the arbitrators who preside over these proceedings, should a woman be brave enough to file a complaint, usually rule in favour of the financial institution.

In fact, Sherry points out, two of every three such cases are decided in Wall Street’s favor, acting as a further deterrent for women wanting to file complaints. Then, making sure they are gagged and bound, the agreement stipulates that the complainant must bear half the arbitration costs, which could run into thousands of dollars!

The final nail in the coffin that makes sure a female employee is gagged, bound and cornered is that she is also forced to waive her right to participate in class action suits alleging gender bias. Non-disclosure agreements and other draconian legal provisions make sure that what happens on Wall Street, stays on Wall Street.

So what does a woman gain by trading in her self-respect and dignity for a career on Wall Street?

Ironically, the ‘work experience’ is the biggest payoff because the money, although good, sure as hell isn’t anywhere near what her male colleagues are making. Like every other survey of MBA gads and their remuneration, a 2015 survey conducted by Bloomberg Businessweek found that women MBAs working in finance, earned an average $53,200 less than men, a year.

The disparity remained regardless of the kind of job they held – women in marketing at a bank earned $7,000 less than men while women investment bankers earned $115,000 less than their male colleagues.

It doesn’t look like the ‘bull-pen’ mentality is about to change any time soon but that does not mean women should not stand up for their rights every chance they get. Remember Muriel Siebert, widely known as the ‘first lady of Wall Street’? Siebert was the first woman to buy a seat on the New York Stock Exchange and the first woman to head one of the exchange’s member firms – and she barrelled through this male-dominated domain with grit and grace.

Amazingly, every step she took for herself was also a step forward for women, even if it meant sticking her head in a loo! Some may recall how Siebert got the chairman of the New York Stock Exchange to build a toilet on the seventh floor of the exchange, no mean feat back in 1987. Under the threat of having Siebert install a portable toilet there, he promptly gave in, saving women employees a long trek down a flight of stairs.

Legends like Siebert come along only once in a lifetime but there are many others raising a war cry. Among them is Sallie Krawcheck, once a high-ranking executive with Bank of America and Citigroup. In 2013, Krawcheck took a bold leap and bought 85 Broads (renamed ‘Ellevate’), a global women’s networking organisation that helps high-powered women connect with and mentor other women.

Putting her money where her mouth is, she said that networking and mentorship is the “unspoken secret to success” on Wall Street. “I believe we’re at a tipping point of women’s engagement in the economy. Our community’s ability to play an important role in that is exciting, as we move from advocacy of women to the smart business of real investment in women,” she remarked.
Siebert would have called that ‘one giant step for womankind’.

Also read The dark side of Investment Banking
 
References: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 | Image: credit


Watch these videos: MBA abroad requirements | International MBA Guide

Serious about higher education? Join us on social media for regular updates.

MBA Crystal Ball provides professional Admissions Consulting services. Hire us to improve your chances of getting into the top international universities. Email: info [at] mbacrystalball [dot] com

MBA Crystal Ball //
MBA Crystal Ball
Our counsellors can help you with career counselling and admissions consulting. Check out our free resources for: GMAT Preparation & GMAT Syllabus | MBA Subjects | MBA Scholarships | And much more

4 Comments

  1. Sushma says:

    People generally don’t like when they are asked the questions that matter. So they will give it back to you in some or the other way. Especially when it’s a woman they din’t even consider answering , I am not sure if that’s because we are few in number and it dint really matter what we thought .
    Because everybody else agrees and most of them are men. This was my experience in the last company.

  2. Aparna says:

    Hi Sir,

    I am an Electronics & Communication engineer of 2008 batch from not so reputed college with 68%,having experience of 6 yrs in telecommunication in govt. telecom company, with average score in 10th & 12th also (65% & 70%resp). As i am feeling stuck in telecom sector,neither expecting promotion nor better switch in a good private company,so thinking to write GMAT for better career opportunities & shift in some other sector.
    Let me know your views over it for a female approaching 29.

  3. Pgupta says:

    Hello Sameer,

    I am an Indian female, engineering background. GMAT score 680 (Q48,V35) and 2.5 years of work experience in IT industry. Can you suggest some good US colleges in which I stand a fair chance?

  4. Sameer Kamat says:

    @Sushma: Unfortunate to see that the situation is the same, whether it’s Wall Street or Dalal Street.

    @Aparna: Sure. you can try for GMAT MBA. Shouldn’t you be having 8 years experience? If there has been a gap in between, it’ll make it tougher in the application.

    @Pgupta: Here’s what makes it tough for us to give a quick and easy answer: https://www.mbacrystalball.com/blog/2011/10/26/how-not-to-select-business-schools-mba-application-don%e2%80%99ts/

    You can start off looking at the Financial Times ranking and narrow it down to a few that fit your profile and career objectives

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *