Especially in India, it’s safe to say applicants have GMAT at the top of their minds. Questions come stumbling out of candidate’s minds with a concern-filled tone and into the open at every single MBA admissions event I’ve been part of.
“What is a good enough GMAT score? Is there a good enough score?”
“How important is the GMAT score?”
“How important are AWA and IR scores?”
“What’s the break-up (verbal / quant / AWA / IR) of a successful candidate’s score?”
“How does the Admissions Committee view candidates with a low GMAT score that’s not up to the mark?”
“What if I have a low verbal score but high quant score? Or low integrated reasoning (IR) and AWA scores?”
“Which score will you consider if I take GMAT more than once?”
And I haven’t even touched the tip of the iceberg with these questions. I’ve seen candidates gloat about their scores and have this unmistakable sense of achievement if they have what they think is in the “safe zone.”
I’ve also seen candidates concerned about how to make the best impression on the Admissions Committee if they’ve not done as well as they thought they would. Suffice it to say the reaction of candidates to GMAT spans the gamut – from exhilaration on good performance to trepidation at the mere mention of it and everything in between.
Yes, doing well in GMAT bodes well to begin with, because it’s a standardized test and it’s sort of an indicator on how well one is able to assimilate the given (limited) information and reach a reasonable conclusion. It’s also supposed to showcase one’s comfort with numbers. These two are important skills to have for candidates who want to do an MBA – a degree which is often seen as a rite of passage for leapfrogging into corporate leadership roles in companies large and small around the world.
But are candidates over-emphasizing GMAT performance at the risk of submitting a less compelling application because somehow, they’ve been lulled into thinking that GMAT is the end-all-be-all and that, a good performance (in their view anyway) is somehow going to help the Admissions Committee gloss over the rest of the application?
In many ways, the answer is an uncomfortable, “yes.”
I’ve seen candidates fret about GMAT not once or twice or even thrice, but some have given the test something like seven, eight, or nine times in order to get that awesome (again in their view) score!
Giving GMAT multiple times is fine, but in your quest for that dream score, are you ignoring the remaining part of the application?
You’re exhausted after repeated attempts at GMAT and just want to get the application out of the way. It’s an understandable feeling, but hardly justifiable since a compelling application is a must to get into that dream school – not so much a dream GMAT score.
At the Tuck School of Business, we treat GMAT as just another data point regarding a candidate’s potential. Nothing more, nothing less. No application ever gets screened on the basis of one’s GMAT performance. We appreciate the efforts you have put in to submit your application, so we take the effort to read every bit of the application you’ve submitted irrespective of GMAT score. And we take a call on the application after a holistic review and not be biased one way or another because of a GMAT performance.
Just think about this for a second. Let’s say an applicant has done an all-round good job in the application, but wasn’t able to perform to her potential in the GMAT since she was either unwell, or had job-related pressures or a personal issue that came up or something else that impacted her.
Should her entire application be considered on the basis on her performance on that particular day? Should her future hang only on the basis of her GMAT score, when there was a genuine reason why she wasn’t able to put her best foot forward the day of the test? We think not.
In fact, we are pro-candidate to a fault. If a candidate has reached a high water mark in one section (e.g. quant section), wasn’t able to perform well in the others (verbal, AWA or Integrated Reasoning), has decided to take the test again, and this time scored high in the other section, but not as well in the section in which she did well earlier, we consider those independent high water marks as valid performances in GMAT.
What I’ve described above is a Tuck-specific approach, and so please don’t take this as the approach of business schools in general. For us, what matters is that we’re making the life of the applicant as easy as possible and allowing them to focus on what is important – the application. We want to get to know you and GMAT is an indicator but not a descriptor.
A stellar application will allow us to overlook your GMAT performance but not the other way around.
Somehow, applicants in India obsess over GMAT more than what I’ve seen in any other part of the world. I had a candidate tell me she was retaking GMAT since she thought her prior score of 750 was sub-par for an Indian applicant. Every candidate is welcome to her own judgment on what is a good GMAT score, and I respect that, but I have to remind everyone, “Don’t ignore the application itself at the end of the day.”
Regarding the other components of GMAT (AWA and IR scores), again, there isn’t a magic number that pushes things one way or another, but what will get the attention of an Admissions Committee is an extraordinarily low performance on either of these sections that somehow is at odds with the skills we expect of a well-rounded individual at a certain point in her career.
All of these are data points along with the rest of the application and not a make-or-break input.
A perfect score in GMAT is not going to get you automatically admitted, and neither is a below average score going to get you automatically denied.
The application is, ultimately, the king!
Just make sure you put your best foot forward, do your research, and make an all-round compelling case for yourself. You’ll be in good shape!
A vast majority of schools want you to give TOEFL and demonstrate your proficiency in English.
At Tuck, again, we err on the side of the candidate, and as long as your undergraduate studies were conducted in English, we trust you’re able to communicate fairly well even if English is not your native language.
As such, very rarely have I seen applicants from India requiring TOEFL to apply to Tuck.